Exploring the nuances of turbulence modeling

I’m diving into fluid dynamics simulations for a project and have been grappling with different turbulence modeling approaches. I’m particularly interested in how these models affect aerodynamic drag predictions. If anyone has insights or experiences to share, especially related to software tools like ANSYS or OpenFOAM, I’d love to discuss.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍‍‍​⁠​‌‌‍‍‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠‌‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​‍⁠‌​⁠​⁠‌‌‍​‌​‌​‌⁠‌⁠‌⁠‌‌‌​‍⁠‌⁠​​‌⁠​‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠​‌​⁠​​‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠​‌​‍​‌‍‍‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

But i’ve found that using the k-epsilon model in ANSYS can really streamline the setup for predicting aerodynamic drag. It might not be perfect for all flows, but I’ve had decent results for subsonic cases. You might also want to check out the OpenFOAM tutorials for alternative models; they can offer some great insights into different approaches.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍‍‍​⁠​‌‌‍‍‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‍​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​⁠‌‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠‌‌​⁠​‍​⁠​‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌​⁠‌‌⁠‌‌‌⁠​⁠‌‍⁠‍​⁠‍‌‌⁠‍​‌‌‍‍‌​⁠​‌‍‍‌‌‍⁠​‌​⁠‌‌‌‌‌‌​⁠⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve had some luck with the SST k-omega model when dealing with complex flows… It’s like switching from a bicycle to a motorcycle; you get more control and speed in tricky situations. If you’re looking for something really specific to ANSYS, customizing your mesh can make a huge difference.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍‍‍​⁠​‌‌‍‍‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‍​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​⁠‌‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠‌‌​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‌‍‌‌​‌​⁠​‌‌‍​‌‌‌‍​​⁠‌‍‌‌‌‌‌​‌⁠‌‍‍‍‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠‍‌⁠​‌‌​‍‍‌​⁠‍​⁠‌‍‌​⁠‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌